Mathematics desk
< April 9	<< Mar \| April \| May >>	April 11 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

April 10

LaTeX "compromise"

Is there a way of rendering \displaystyle in LaTeX such that it is slightly smaller, just as in a superscript or subscript?

e.g.

$e^{This\,\sum _{n}^{looks}asty\,with\,subscripts_{n}}$

$e^{This\,\displaystyle \sum _{b}^{looks}etter\,but\,is\,too\,large_{b}}$

x42bn6 Talk Mess 19:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you are concerned about the final subscript of a superscript:

e^{This\,\sum _{better}^{looks}\,what\,do\,you\,think?_{\scriptstyle {n}}}

e^{This\,\sum _{nasty}^{looks}\,just\,like\,the\,original_{\scriptscriptstyle {n}}}

If you are concerned about the later text of the superscript:

e^{This\,\displaystyle \sum _{better}^{looks}\,\scriptstyle {what\,do\,you\,think?}_{b}}

And don't forget \mathrm, \mathit, \mbox and their kin:

e^{\mathrm {This} \,\displaystyle \sum _{\mathit {best}}^{\mathit {looks}}\,\scriptstyle {\mathit {what\,do\,you\,think\!?}}_{b}}

Baccyak4H (Yak!) 02:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll take a look at those solutions. I was looking for a "shrunk" version of \displaystyle but couldn't find one. x42bn6 Talk Mess 23:15, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simplifying factorial equations

What software exists to help simplify equations involving large factorials? Neon Merlin 21:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any mathematical software should be able to handle factorials. Try Mathematica or Maple (or many others, but those are the two I know a little about). --Tango (talk) 22:39, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Or SAGE, which is free, includes and unifies other pre-existing free mathematical software (among which GAP computer algebra system) and can use functions and packages from Mathematica, Maple etc., if you have them. Then again, perhaps this is a bit of an overkill just to simplify some factorials. Goochelaar (talk) 08:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It will help if you give an example of what you have in mind. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 09:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Depending on what you're doing, you may be able to use the Gamma function or Stirling's approximation to simplify things (perhaps even reduce things to pencil & paper territory). -- 128.104.112.85 (talk) 18:01, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Algebra

How do you solve

 4sinx0 +1 = -2

^^**^**^^*^*^*^**^22:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)172.141.191.133 (talk)

DOVENSTONE

I assume you mean find x such that

4\sin x+1=-2

. Just rearrange the equation until you have

\sin x=a

where a is some constant, and then take inverse sin of both sides. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:21, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

4sinx + 1 = -2 Isolate x or for now sinx so subtract 1 and divide by 4. Sinx = -3/4 then take the sin inverse of -3/4 I don't have a calculator with me but I'm sure you can do that so you should get x= #. I'm pretty sure that should be it

Draw a circle with center at B=(0,0) and radius 4. Let A=(4,0). Draw a horizontal line through the point (0,-3) meeting the circle at a point C on the left of y-axis. Then the angle ABC is your x. Using a compass, you can get an approximate value. I never use any powerful calculator in my life. twma 13:00, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]