Jump to content

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Language/2022 January 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Language desk
< January 11 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 13 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Language Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


January 12

[edit]

Outside of something

[edit]
The Valeriepieris circle on a Winkel tripel projection

Is there a difference in meaning between these two sentences?

  • More people live inside this circle than outside it.
  • More people live inside this circle than outside of it.

Thanks, cmɢʟeeτaʟκ 10:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, though the second one is slightly more explanatory. As with the old quip (usually credited to Groucho Marx), "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read." --←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots15:06, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is some doubt that the joke originated with Groucho.[1] While outside of  is synonymous with the preposition outside, it has a second meaning, which it does not share with outside: "except for", "aside from". The joke exploits this dual meaning.  --Lambiam 15:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For consistency, you should probably use "of" twice, or omit it twice. --←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots15:48, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Inside of" is possible but not usual, and I wouldn't use it merely for consistency with "outside of". -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 20:53, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Inside of" sounds okay to these Canadian ears (although I prefer the more colourful "innards of", preferably with "outards of"). Clarityfiend (talk) 22:04, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, everyone. I'll thus omit of in my redrawing of File:Valeriepieris_Circle.jpg. Cheers, cmɢʟeeτaʟκ 01:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved