Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Language/2017 October 23
Language desk | ||
---|---|---|
< October 22 | << Sep | October | Nov >> | October 24 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Language Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
October 23
[edit]Operatic soprano
[edit]For the Wikidata item d:Q5681011 label, which is the correct order of the adjectives: "lyric dramatic soprano" or "dramatic lyric soprano"? -- Deborahjay (talk) 08:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- I don't think there can be a definitive answer to this, beyond some rough and ready frequency data. Google searches for me produce about 26,000 hits for the former, and just over 1000 for the latter. HenryFlower 10:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- When typing the provisional Wikidata item label in English, I thought along the lines of [ADJ +] lyric soprano (227K ghits) vs. [ADJ +] dramatic soprano (166K ghits). Also, the Google search field for "dramatic" also suggested it modifying "mezzo soprano", "coloratura soprano", and the "lyric soprano" of my query. Other than consulting a academic music library for a lookup in a Groves-type lexicon, I'll leave this stet for now. -- Deborahjay (talk) 11:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Jumble
[edit]collapse "pointless unclear question" to save space |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. I hope all understand what I mean by this interesting word game. Can someone be kind enough to tell me where one can find them on the net. 125.62.118.108 (talk) 09:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC) Thanks Jayron. Of course I already have been thru all such Google-findable sites before putting it on the RF. Alas they have nothing much to offer a fan! What I was expecting was some unique discovery by some relentless surfer like you. If possible please ask someone else who may by chance know of some good site by accidentally come across it while surfing. You know, as in other fields, sometimes excellent sites etc. remain undiscovered by bots etc of Google.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
If this is to be closed, it should be collapsed. μηδείς (talk) 21:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC) |