Wikipedia:Portal peer review/Wales/archive1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I worked on this back in December and I've just got back into portals again, so I was wondering whether I could receive any feedback on the Wales Portal. Updates will be given and I am open to other suggestions. Rudget (?) 12:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- Looks nice. Please add instructions/information how to add new Selected articles and SPs. Add DYK and News archives. Fix "Associated Wikimedia" links. It would be great if the Sel. articles (and SPs) were wikilinked at the beginning, at the subject's name. Any updates on news? feydey (talk) 13:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- Will be adding them all soon. Thanks for the swift response. Rudget (?) 13:17, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- Some points:
- DYKs - there are currently none relating to Wales - according to WP:WALES
Not done - News -
Done - Selected article and SPs:
Doing... (may need some help from you on that) That's probably the only thing I don't know what to do with portals. :P - Hopefully that wraps it up. Rudget (?) 14:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- DYKs - there are currently none relating to Wales - according to WP:WALES
- Add DYK archives and News archives by creating actual archive pages, see Portal:Literature. feydey (talk) 18:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- For DYK's, you could trawl through the archives at Wikipedia:Recent additions (all 203 of them!) to find some interesting Wales related ones to get you started. It's not essential though as many portals prefer to produce their own. Nanonic (talk) 06:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- You can also go here: Link to see all DYKs with "Wales" in the hook. Hope that helps! §tepshep • ¡Talk to me! 02:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- All done. Now going to WP:FPOC. Rudget. 15:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.