Wikipedia:Portal peer review/Percussion/archive1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I have spent a couple days developing this portal, and think it has many (but not all) the qualifications to be featured. Any constructive comments are appreciated. Kakofonous (talk) 17:35, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- I noticed that your "Selected ..." boxes are hard-links, meaning that someone will have to manually change the content as time passes, leading to update problems in future. There are two ways around this: timed and random article selection, examples of which you can currently (3 March 2008) see at Portal:Linguistics and Portal:Peer review, respectively. Other than that the portal looks nice. --Msanford (talk) 16:02, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- I used the {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} and {{CURRENTYEAR}} variables for selected content (see for example Portal:Percussion/Selected article)—isn't that timed selection? --Kakofonous (talk) 23:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I should have looked deeper in your code. I only saw {{Portal:Percussion/Selected article}} but didn't think to look at that page's content directly. You're quite right, and have a very sophisticated archive to boot! I would say that the lack of comments over the weeks is due to the portal being quite good. (Let this be a lesson to me to check everything). --Msanford (talk) 00:11, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- I used the {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} and {{CURRENTYEAR}} variables for selected content (see for example Portal:Percussion/Selected article)—isn't that timed selection? --Kakofonous (talk) 23:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.