Jump to content

Wikipedia:Portal peer review/Law of England and Wales/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


A new portal, but I hope it's hit the ground running. The portal has, so far (numbers updated during this peer review):

  • Selected article: 19 articles (5 FAs, 3 FLs, 10 GAs; 1 B-class (Welsh law, given its importance to the topic))
  • Selected biography: 8 articles (2 FAs, 6 GAs) - I can't find any more relevant high-quality legal biography articles
  • Selected case: 10 articles (1 FA, 9 GAs)
  • Selected legislation: 10 articles (1 FA, 9 GAs)
  • Selected picture: 14 (1 is an FP) for clarity, there were only 6 when Fetchcomms commented
  • Selected quotation - 14, all sourced
  • DYKs - 10 sets of 5, all from the DYK archives

I'm trying to get the Wikinews section working properly, but the bot seems to dislike it at the moment... can you see what's wrong?! Now working

Much of the content has been written by Ironholds (talk · contribs). Any comments on how I might improve the portal to Featured status? Thanks for your time. BencherliteTalk 20:10, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from /ƒETCHCOMMS/
  • In the news has a currently-blank "From Wales" section; can this header be set to only appear when there is news on Wales?
  • More selected pics (maybe 10 or so?)
  • Some quotes are quite long and others quite short. Can some of the long ones be cut slightly (a sentence or two shorter, so they don't seem tedious to read?)
  • Otherwise, seems pretty well done. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 00:39, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Welsh news added manually, still waiting for the Wikinews Importer Bot to get going! Now workinh
  • Agree that more pictures are needed, and will try to do so next week if not before. Now up to 10, will keep looking.
  • Trimmed the three longest ones.
  • Thanks for your help. BencherliteTalk 09:29, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.