Wikipedia:Portal peer review/Free software/archive2

Portal:Free software

Hi all. I've been working on Portal:Free software (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), sporadically, for some time now, with Featured portal status as the ultimate aim. I solicit input with a view to filing a FPO nomination after all issues have been resolved. What issues, if any, would result in a nomination failing if it was filed with the portal as it currently stands?

Thanks for all input, —AGK 12:28, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just took a quick skim over it. The page format looks good, very well structured. The OS section looks a little disorganised to me. And maybe try another color. Everyone is using blue. Uniqueness counts if your going for featured.Drew Smith W hat I've done 14:18, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input, Drew; I'll take steps to implement your suggestions. AGK 16:07, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using monthly-update format as we'll be slowly phrasing it out. We are having problems with people maintaining it each page. Instead, people select about 20 articles and it will be displayed randomly. Maintainers only need to update it every few months yet the portal remains stable. In short, change it from monthly to the archives format. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 04:26, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]