Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Tuxedo kitten

Striking and encyclopedic, but I am biased so I thought I'd leave this up to somebody else! Tim Vickers (talk) 04:45, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think my heart just exploded. I don't see this getting support though for a variety of reasons. (1) It doesn't accompany an article; (2) it's pretty standard-quality point-and-shoot photo, etc. So, so cute though!—DMCer™ 10:39, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, very cute. Although he is in the article Cat senses as an example of whiskers, I wasn't sure about the quality requirements. Thanks anyway. Tim Vickers (talk) 17:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What I love about it is that this tiny creature looks absolutely as sure of itself as Admiral Farragut. Photographs that regard animals on their own terms are remarkable. The distracting background prevents me from supporting, but keep shooting while this little fellow is still tiny! Durova^Charge! 19:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]