Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Singing Ringing Tree

A good, large image of an interesting subject

Articles this image appears in: Singing Ringing Tree (Panopticons), Panopticons

Subjectively I think you could pick a better time of day lighting wise (more wow). I'd say that it is detailed enough etc. You need to fix the tilt. The article for singing ringing tree would be better with a recording. Noodle snacks (talk) 04:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, The freedom of panorama laws in the UK probably need to be checked, I'm not sure of the story there (its fine here). Noodle snacks (talk) 04:28, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I like the idea of a recording, i shall try it one day although the tree generally makes a noise indistinguishable from the noise of wind. Also what do the freedom of panorama laws cover? Public art, sculptures etc? and if so why is this one okay? also re; the lighting, i think it accentuates the shape of the tree as the pipes are shaded and unshaded (however i do take on board the opinion of a more experienced photographer) --Childzy ¤ Talk 10:38, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- - Just to confirm, public art is fair game here too.--Childzy ¤ Talk 14:43, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - I was just asking about the public art as I didn't know the story. If you can get there at sunrise or sunset (depending on the sculpture orientation) with some cloud around you would have directional light still, but it would be softer and fill in the shadows more. The colours would be less dull too. That is entirely up to you though, it doesn't really change the EV. If you can't be around at those times, then ideally you want the sun a bit more behind you. Noodle snacks (talk) 21:01, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I see a stitching error at the horizon above the wind turbines. Jujutacular ^T · C 00:27, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There is also one above and to the right of the left-most fence post on the lower right-hand side of the picture. Drew.magoo (talk) 18:05, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]