Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Ecchi

Illustration for the term Ecchi

Original - Drawing of a revealing figure with typical elements from manga and anime. Note that the contours are emphasized and the hair disappears behind the eyes, which is often (but not generally) the case. This image is an an infinitely scalable SVG-graphic. Because Wikimedias internal renderer rsvg has many bugs when creating thumbnails or with handling filters, its suggested to use and to look at the PNG-export instead, until support increases.

It is already featured in many projects and was under the finalists of Picture of the Year 2008 from Commons. It's last nomination in 2010 was denied because of bad composition (dutch angle) and that it would be to revealing for the main page. As no consensus could be found, i was told to renominate it after some time again. An alternative with different perspective would be the image to the left.

Articles this image appears in

Ecchi (on EN, further more on other projects) Note: both versions are in use

Creator

Niabot

Suggested by

Niabot (talk) 12:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Alternative with removed dutch angle

Comments

• Issues of composition aside, the leg on the upright JPG version is posterized. NotFromUtrecht (talk) 12:31, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Fixed the issue. Was actually an export error from Inkscape. --Niabot (talk) 14:53, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Hmmm, I can still see quite a lot of posterization: it's probably more noticeable in the blossom in the top left corner? Also, why have you uploaded this as a JPG not as a SVG, especially since the previous version is an SVG? NotFromUtrecht (talk) 16:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

I used some SVG-filters on the background and rsvg (used for thumbnails on Wikipedia) can't handle them at all. One example: File:Vergleich zwischen Manga und Foto (nur Zeichnung).svg --Niabot (talk) 16:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

I uploaded the SVG-version. But some details are expected to look wrong, depending on the renderer used. For voting´s i would suggest the export, because its always the same, that the images look bad, just because of the renderer used. --Niabot (talk) 16:37, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Seconder