Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Dusky Leaf Monkey

Technically sound and good depiction of the subject.

I support this image. It shows a good shot of the Dusky Leaf Monkey. The image is clear and in focus. --Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) 15:51, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Often, pictures like this are opposed for being cut-off and not showing the entire animal, since that hurts encyclopedic value (EV). Makeemlighter (talk) 07:26, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
By the way do you have a picture that shows the FULL monkey? That might have made a better image. --Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) 09:18, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Makeemlighter makes a valid point, but I still like this. Another issue could be the blown highlights (or near to) especially on the left shoulder and top of his head, and it's maybe a tad tightly cropped at the top. Nonetheless I suggest giving it a try at FPC. --jjron (talk) 14:57, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think its important to have a full picture of this monkey. Its tail is one of the more recognizable features as its pale color contrasts the rest of the body. However, a point could be made that it would be difficult to get a tight shot of the monkey's face while still including the tail because of the tail's length.--Zulualpha (talk) 19:02, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll vote for it, its a great shot. However some wont like the crop as mentioned above. Let us know if you have an uncropped --Childzy ¤ Talk 23:20, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]