Wikipedia:Peer review/Woodstock/archive1
Alas, I was too little to attend Woodstock back in 1969, and needed to rely on secondary sources for my copious recent edits to the article. Any Woodstock alumni/alumnae out here — or other folks around here — who could check this article for accuracy's sake and otherwise? Anyone up to the groovy challenge here, go for it! —Peace, Catdude 00:14, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- CITE the references used per WP:CITE. PDXblazers 01:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- Much merit in that, PDXblazers. Due to what's on my plate right now, it will regrettably take me a little time to tackle your suggestion, but I'm game to it as soon as I have more available time :) (It would have been better as well if I had kept a log of where I found information :-) ) Thanks!! —Catdude 02:22, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
- ALSO Get rid of the short trivia section, such a section is unencyclopedic. PDXblazers 04:55, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
- Some quick notes:
- The word "The" should not appear in the beginning of a heading per WP:MOS (example: The festival -> Festival)
- Please expand the WP:LEAD to conform to guidelines (at least 2 paragraphs)
- References and inline citations would be helpful. Ideally each section should have at least one footnote.
- Please use the
(no-break space) between numbers and their units of measure, per WP:MOSNUM. - Years without full dates generally aren't linked, per WP:CONTEXT.
- The last couple of prose sections could use expansion
- Trivia needs to go; incorporate or remove it.
- The rest of the article is too list-weighty, and more of the lists should be prose-ified (converted to paragraph form). Thanks, AndyZ t 23:34, 29 April 2006 (UTC)