Wikipedia:Peer review/WilliamsF1/archive1
I've been working on expanding and referencing the article during the last 3 days and I'm stuck...so I'm hoping this Peer Review will give me a better idea on what needs to be done...such as sentances that need referencing...and the dreaded Weasal Words...Any suggestions would be appriciated ;). --Skully Collins 14:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 14:10, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, Skully. I hate to mention it, but Frank Williams Racing Cars is a totally different team to Williams F1 - they shouldn't be part of the same article (IMHO, of course!). Frank himself was about the only common factor between the two. I'll take up the discussion on the talk page. Cheers. 4u1e 18:40, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- One other thing that worries me with the constructor articles - for the teams with a long history at least - is that it can read like "just one damn thing after another" to misquote someone or other on history. One approach that may work is to split out the article into more sections, as I am trying to do with Brabham, so different kinds of topics, like technical innovation (a good category for Williams!), notable drivers etc form separate sections. Just a thought. 4u1e 18:40, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, and it's really worth trying Andy's automated suggestions, by the way. They helped me with the Fittipaldi (constructor) article. 4u1e 18:40, 19 July 2006 (UTC)