Wikipedia:Peer review/Unfinished work/archive1

Unfinished work

I don't think this can be expanded much further, but other people might have some ideas that I've not thought about yet. There are some references still needed, but I think the examples illustrate the article well. Any comments or ideas before I take it forward to FA? violet/riga (t) 15:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It looks good and is well referenced, but reads a bit like a list. Also, Film should be moved to the end. Such short article generally don't make FA, Have you tried WP:GA?Self-Described Seabhcán 16:27, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If it's complete then size doesn't matter for FA. I'll see if I can flesh things out to move it away from reading like a list. And the film section is first because it's alphabetical, though I could understand the chronological order idea. Thanks for the comments. violet/riga (t) 19:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ _t 01:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Undergone several expansions, 22:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC) violet/riga (t)