Wikipedia:Peer review/Turner Catledge/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because, as my first fully written article, I'd like to know how I did. Don't hesitate to provide constructive criticism!
Thanks, [Belinrahs|talktome⁄ ididit] 16:59, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
First off, good work for your first article. I think what needs to be done now is find more reliable sources with information on Catledge and expand the article using that. I'll give you some tips on where to find sources.
- On an unrelated note, please add ALT text to the one image. Pretend you're describing the image to someone over the phone.
- Answers.com isn't a reliable source because anybody can add content. Instead of citing answers.com, you should cite the Columbia Encyclopedia directly.
- A simple Google (or whatever search engine) search may come up with good info. Remember to always check for reliability, though. I found this great source, and you'll probably come up with something if you dig through the articles listed here. I have access to nearly all old NYT articles, so leave me a message if you need them e-mailed. Another great find is this Time article. This should be enough for now, but after you've exhausted these sources, you can always go to the next pages on the Google search.
- Always next for me is Google Books. See the results of the search here. If you can't see the needed text, go to a local library and inquire about those books.
- Google News may often turns up results, so I suggest trying. This time, it turned up lots of good stuff.
- Now that you have the sources, you need to incorporate their info into the article. Read through all the sources one-by-one, adding useful information you come across.
I'm surprised that nobody had bothered to improve this article before you, with all that information available. Good luck, and feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Cheers, Mm40 (talk) 16:19, 27 November 2009 (UTC)