Wikipedia:Peer review/Theramenes/archive1

Theramenes

I'm aiming at FA for this one. Feedback about the way I've handled the sources would be particularly appreciated, as would magically pulling some images of Theramenes out of thin air. All other comments will be helpful too, of course :-). --Robth^Talk 06:22, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As always, you've meticulously researched and footnoted the hell out of it. Nice work. I suspect the lead section is too long, though. And the lack of images is disappointing, but what can you do? Since no one really knows what he looked like, I suppose you could use a random image and claim that it's Theramenes. :) – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 18:07, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right about the lead; I've had lead section-itis for a few weeks now, and I'm not sure why. I shrank it. The image thing really is a shame, since a face at the top of a biography is always a nice touch; I'm tempted to find some photo of an unidentified statue and caption it "some ancient greeks, possibly including Theramenes, looked something like this." Thanks for the feedback. --Robth^Talk 08:16, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]