Wikipedia:Peer review/The Moon and the Sandals/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for April 2009.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to see how this article can be improved to GA-class or later, FA-class.
Thanks, Extremepro (talk) 00:41, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Comments from Tintor2 (talk) 14:19, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- The lead should be longer per WP: Lead. Try adding a short overview of reception.
- For only 2 volumes the plot sections seems to be very long.
- If if you know information about the creation of the manga it would be good to add it. Since the publication section is a bit short merge it with the section about creation once it is created. I guess it could be named Development and publication.
- Agreed on the plot (I wrote it to replace the incorrect one there, but left a note on the talk page that it needs paring down). I will recheck the volumes tonight to see if there is any production information, but I'm pretty sure there wasn't. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC)