Wikipedia:Peer review/Tara Conner/archive1
It just struck me today that this article could be worthy of being a Featured Article if it had some work. Its a bit tricky at the moment due to the controversy but inappropriate edits and vandalism are being quickly reverted my myself and others. Any comments regarding whether this article could make featured status or suggested improvements as to how I could get the article to that stage would be appreciated. I have been working on improving the references which is now in a consistent style. The majority of points are footnoted. I know the topic isn't everyone's cup of tea but its come a long way and I'm quite pleased with the result as it evolves. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 08:14, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I can guarantee you it won't meet 1e for a little while. Also, I ran the peer review script and posted the results on the article's talk page.--NMajdan•talk 19:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, have made improvements based on the script. As for 1e, I appreciate we'll have to wait for things to die down a bit, in the meantime I have had the page semi-protected. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 02:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)