Wikipedia:Peer review/Talbot Tagora/archive1
Appearance
I believe this article might have FA potential, so I would like to hear from you what you think requires further improving in order to make it a successful nominee. The article already went through a internal WikiProject peer review - please see the talk page for issues discussed and how they were addressed. Thank you in advance for your help! Bravada, talk - 17:27, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles).
- Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.
- Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space -
between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like:18 mm
.
- Per WP:MOSNUM, please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.
- As per WP:MOSDATE, dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a.
- You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas.
- Thanks, Andy t 20:04, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
I guess that's it then. I am archiving the peer review and placing it on FAC. Bravada, talk - 19:08, 30 June 2006 (UTC)