Wikipedia:Peer review/Swedish phonology/archive1
The article has been around for quite some time now, but I feel it's time to put it through some proper reviewing, either to nominate the article for GA or perhaps even FA. Peter Isotalo 11:47, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 02:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Jasy jatere comments
[edit]- The lead sentence should mention the subject, i.e. phonology
- Swedish as a second language does not belong in the lead
- lack of standardization should not be presented as a problem
- delist
- first table needs caption or introduction
- the presentation of phonemes and allophones in one table is idiosyncratic. Make two tables, one phonemic,one allophonic
- The reference to stress-timed languages is not appropriate, you probably mean lexical stress.
- The consonant clusters in onset and coda contain extrasyllabic s. This should be mentioned in the phonotactics section
- make the north wind story a three column table
| Phonetic | transcribed | English |
|---|---|---|
| phiphapou | pipapo | foo bar blah |
- The sound samples are very nice, but they should be integrated better into the text. Instead of
| Phoneme (IPA) |
Pronunciation sample, phonemic transcription and translation |
|---|---|
| l | lov, /luːv/, "tack" |
have
== Laterals ==
- /l/ (lov, [luːv], "tack")
Variations of /l/ are not as common, etc blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla blablabla