Wikipedia:Peer review/Sustainable Development Strategy in Canada/archive1
Appearance
- Hello, I am the creator of this article and I am requesting a peer review. I was hoping that at some point in the near future I could escalate the article to a FAR. Octopus-Hands 00:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, I believe we've met. :) You mean an FAC, not FAR. Anyway, here are some suggestions:
- The article currently focuses on simply listing the aims of the SDSC. There are many more kinds of information required to give a complete view of the topic:
- What is the history of the SDSC? For how long has it been in effect? When was it first proposed? And by whom? Is the SDSC the result of a law that has been made? If not, who enacted these directives?
- The implementation of the SDSC is somewhat vague. What is actually being done at the national, provincial, and local levels?
- There are a lot of very short sections. Some of them may be merged together. This will make the table of contents shorter.
- Does the concept of the SDSC have its critics?
- The only sources used in the article are the official websites of the Canadian government. This means only one perspective is given in the article.
- In fact, a lot of the material seems copied directly from the Government websites, with the wording changed only a little.
- Has there been press coverage of the SDSC?
- As I mentionned, this is a very strong first effort, but it will need to take a much broader view in order to become a featured article. Andrew Levine 00:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, I believe we've met. :) You mean an FAC, not FAR. Anyway, here are some suggestions:
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 21:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- After a quick look there are a few things which stood out to me.
- Picture is too big and crowds screens, and I am not what it has to do with the topic.
- Too many sections. Most are only one paragraph. These need to be combined into a simpler structure.
- I did not see a section on any oppositon to this program.Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 18:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)