Wikipedia:Peer review/Strike Force Five/archive1

Strike Force Five

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I am sending this to PR in hopes of getting other people's opinions on the article to improve as well as possibly achieving GA status for the article. Any comments on expansions, discrepancies, etc. appreciated. Spinixster (trout me!) 06:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LunaEclipse

Leaving a drive-by comment. You should clairify why critics had positive to mixed opinons on the podcast in the lead. Also, how is Primetimer reliable? 🌙Eclipse ^(talk) ^(contribs) 21:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Primetimer source: the author is a journalist who has written for other sources deemed reliable for Wikipedia. If this source is not okay, I will remove it. Spinixster (trout me!) 04:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Primetimer should be ok for WP then. — 🌙Eclipse ^(talk) ^(contribs) 13:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MyCat

I'm an avid John Oliver fan (if you can't already tell) and this was a gem during the TV dark ages. Happy to review, and let me know when it goes to GAN! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 22:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could be me, but "ideating" seems like an extremely niche word. I appreciate the unique choice, but perhaps "thinking of" would be more understandable
Here comes the annoying comment everyone hates: 'Reception' should be trimmed and summarized more. WP:RECEPTION has some excelletn advice on organization; many of the sentences are just "___ of __ said ___ but __" which doesn't summarize the show's reception well. Ditto with the Fallon scandal paragraph: much of it is opinion quotes, but this should just focus on broad analyses

That's all I got- this is nearly ready for GA. My only other concern is that the reception section is much larger than all the others- however, this isn't too surprising since the podcast was itself quite small-scale. Some pruning of reception (as discussed above) will help- best of luck! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 22:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again, @MyCatIsAChonk! Big John Oliver fan here, too. I tried my best to prune and reorganize the Reception section. For the Fallon scandal, I moved it to the Post-debut section, since I feel like it fits better there, and I also removed some things there, too. Please let me know what you think. (P.S. should I mention the producers using a primary source / podcast episode since I haven't been able to find a reliable source containing them?) Spinixster (trout me!) 01:01, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would probably be best- having their presence is important here, and if primary sources must be used, so be it MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 01:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]