Wikipedia:Peer review/Stormfront (website)/archive1
In general how can the article be improved? In between here and FAC, what needs to happen? --Alecmconroy 17:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- A few points:
- Your lead paragraph is only one densely written paragraph. FACs should have three summing up the entire article.
- The history section jumps from 1997 to 2006: what happened in that time?
- The references, while good, do not have authors. There are also not enough of them; some sentences make bold assertions without any links to back them up. Example, "Critics accuse Stormfront members of supporting violence, genocide, and ethnic cleansing."
- You may want to expand the article, which is too short, by mentioning reaction to Stormfront, in favour of them: any neonazi organisations promote or affiliate to it? You can then spin this, along with mootstormfront into a "reaction" section, rather than keeping it in controversy and criticism.
That's all I can think at the moment. Good luck! Dev920 19:51, 22 September 2006 (UTC)