Wikipedia:Peer review/St. Barnabas Church, Upper Marlboro, Maryland/archive1
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to get this article to GA status. I've put a lot of research in to the article and would like to finish the project.
Thanks, Toddst1 (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 02:16, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- The intro needs expansion, it should include some general facts about the church but not be overly detailed since detail belongs in the article body. Also, image gallery sections are discouraged, I'd recommend moving the images into the article body. Per WP:DATE, dates need to be linked, which I took care of. Check if there are any left though, I might have missed some. One last thing, the format for the accessdate parameters in citation templates should be
yyyy-mm-dd(the month and day need two digits) so that they get automatically linked properly. Keep up the good work!-Jeff (talk) 02:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)- I hope I've addressed the suggestions above. Please let me know if you don't think I have. Thanks for your feedback. Toddst1 (talk) 19:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- I read through the article and mostly saw a high quality article without a lot that sprung to mind in terms of suggestions. The article gives enough related details to keep it interesting (such as the story of Jonathan Boucher's departure), without getting bogged down in any of them. I do second the need for a longer introduction. Kudos to Toddst1 for a job well done. Kingdon (talk) 03:22, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- I hope I've addressed the suggestion above. Please let me know if you don't think I have. Thanks for your feedback. Toddst1 (talk) 19:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC)