Wikipedia:Peer review/Skyfall/archive1

Skyfall

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… the film recently (at last) started production, and thus warranted its own article. Since a James Bond films topic is on the way (we're only waiting for a FLC to close), this needs a peer review to get included. I'm willing to hear all comments and suggestions.

Thanks, igordebraga ≠ 10:38, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I turn down your expectations, but movies that are still in production may not be approved as good or featured articles. Most info about them (plot, cast, title, etc.) is provisional and subject to change anytime for any reason, and there can even be differences between the final movie and the info people had during the production (because the producers may want to conceal some things so that people know them once they are watching the movie). There's also the chance that the movie is never finished or released, if marketing researches discourage it. In short: think about nominations after the movie is released.

As for the article, some proposals. They may not be completely possible right now, but they may be when the movie is released, or when more info becames available

The plot section should be expanded. As it is a movie in a series, point any continuity with the older movies that you know about.
- Put the fact that it doesn't continue the plot of QoS, according.
Are there actors considered and then rejected?
- We're not sure yet, but damn there was speculation.
"Javier Bardem - Skyfall's villain." is not a good photo caption. Javier Bardem is not the villain, he's the actor playing the villain, so reformulate it.
- Done.
Do not link to fansites
Include a "Reception" section as soon as there are opinions about the movie (or about the info known about the movie, such as the choice of actors)

Cambalachero (talk) 15:14, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not aiming for Good status - and the Featured Topic Criteria makes sure to point articles that don't qualify (such as future movies) are required to be peer reviewed. But thanks for responding. igordebraga ≠ 21:14, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]