Wikipedia:Peer review/Skybridge (Vancouver)/archive1

Skybridge (Vancouver)

I would like this pear-reviewed. I think it's main problem is that it hasnt got ne photos, despite us having some good ones already here and there. Brööñëë 18:34, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The photos in question were removed from the article, based on consensus from Talk:Skybridge (Vancouver). Zscout370 (Sound Off) 20:34, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The article stands on its own without any image. An apropriate photograph showing most of the bridge in the foreground or mid-ground can be added later. The article is also part of an expanding series, Bridges of Greater Vancouver, as per the template at the bottom.

Zhatt 20:59, July 29, 2005 (UTC)

I found some photos at http://images.google.com/images?q=Vancouver+SkyTrain&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&start=0&sa=N and at http://images.google.com/images?q=Vancouver+bridge&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&start=80&sa=N. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 21:23, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thoes are most likely all copyrighted, hence the little "© TransLink" on many. You might get away with a {{fairuse}} tag, but I'm not too sure how that works. Altho, this one is very cool.

Zhatt 21:52, July 29, 2005 (UTC)

The fairuse claim wouldn't hold up, better to take some yourself, if you're a local or ask a Canadian wikipedian. This isn't realy an issue for Peer Review.--nixie 03:29, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not. I suggest removing it. Does anyone agree? Zhatt 17:07, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

Removed as request was make by a previously banned user. Zhatt 17:23, August 5, 2005 (UTC)