Wikipedia:Peer review/Shaylee Mansfield/archive1
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion is closed. |
Hi all. This article is on a deaf actress who has already broken huge barriers at just the age of 12 or less. I'm gonna try to get this to FA-status. Hopefully, y'all can help me with some comments.
Thanks! Pamzeis (talk) 01:28, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Comments from Aoba47
[edit]I have honestly never heard of this individual so hopefully that perspective will be helpful with my comments. I would be mindful that Mansfield is still in the early stages of her and the article will have to remain up-to-date and could possibly (and will very likely) look different further down her career. However, that should not be an obstacle for a FAC as people like Taylor Swift and Lady Gaga have FAs even though their careers are still quite active. I only bring this up so you can be mindful of it. My comments are below:
- I have two comments about the following phrase,
former YouTube personality
, from the lead. I think it should be YouTuber instead as I do not really see personality used as often in this context. Also, has she officially said that she is done with YouTube?- DoneHer official website says she starred from 2013 to 2019, implying she's done. CNET calls her a "YouTuber-turned-actor", while CinemaBlend calls her a "former YouTuber".
- I have two comments about this part,
Then, she starred in a Disney "Unforgettable Story"
. I would use a different transition word then "then" as it is not the best. Also, more context will be needed for "Unforgettable Story" as I do not know what this is. - The lead should mention where she was born and where she grew up.
- Instead of auto-captioning, I would say automatic captioning with the link. I would also link Instagram in the lead.
- Done
- Have you considered making a request for a copy-edit from the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors? I am only suggesting this as I think the prose in the lead could use some further work. I also think the prose as a whole could use further work to reach the FA level.
- Done
- The citation placement in the first sentence of the "2009–2018: Early life and viral videos" subsection cuts the sentence in an awkward way that impairs readability.
- Moved
- I am not really familiar with deafness at all so apologies if this is super obvious, but is this phrasing,
Her younger sister, Ivy, is hearing
, correct? It just reads as rather odd to me.- I think so. From my experience, it's the same as saying someone is deaf (grammatically, not, y'know)
- Do we have further background about how she started reading Christmas stories on ASL Nook and her parents' likely involvement with that?
- I can't find anything from my searches... D'you have anything on your end... or something?
- I am not really sure what this part,
which honors events within the Disney parks and resorts
, means. - Do we have further context on what "Unforgettable Stories" is?
- Attempted to expand
- Is there more information on Born This Way: Deaf Out Loud, even like who produced it and where it was released.
- I get what you mean by this part,
The agent arranged to meet with her, but only on that particular day
, but I find it awkwardly phrased and it would benefit from revision. The "that particular day" part in particular seems off to me. - The word "helped" does not really make sense in this context,
helped In July 2019, she was announced to have
.- Typo 🤦♀️
- I do not fully understand this sentence:
The production hired multiple ASL interpreters and coaches to ensure accuracy.
Why would these interpreters and coaches be needed? To ensure the accuracy of what? - Is there a reason for the invisible comment?
I hope these comments are helpful and encourage other reviewers to participate in this peer review. My primary concern for this article is the prose. I do not think it is on the level expected for a FA/FAC so I would encourage you to request a GOCE copy-edit. If you do pursue this route, I would make sure to specify in the request that this would be a copy-edit in preparation for a FAC as this will influence how the copy-editor approaches the article. Best of luck with this! Aoba47 (talk) 04:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Pamzeis Are you planning to respond to these comments? Should the PR be closed? (t · c) buidhe 08:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- I'm kinda waiting for the copy edit to go through first... I would prefer the PR not be closed, since the copy edit can't be that far away... Pamzeis (talk) 10:31, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Timestamping to avoid closure. Pamzeis (talk) 02:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Aoba47: Hopefully, I have addressed your comments. Apologies for the delay... Lemme know if you have any other concerns or need clarification regarding the above comments. Thanks. Pamzeis (talk) 12:08, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
- Timestamping to avoid closure. Pamzeis (talk) 02:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
- I'm kinda waiting for the copy edit to go through first... I would prefer the PR not be closed, since the copy edit can't be that far away... Pamzeis (talk) 10:31, 3 March 2022 (UTC)