Wikipedia:Peer review/Shared universe/archive1
I've expanded and referenced this substantially from its origins. I'd like the input of others to see where to take it from here. While I think it might be GA at this point, my goal is to eventually aim for the top. Issues I know to be of concern:
- Is this correctly described as a literary technique? Should it instead be "in narratology"? Something else entirely?
- I am of mixed opinions regarding the blockquote. It is large, but I think its complexity helps to underscore how confusing the topic can get. Is it a good addition, or should I try to find something shorter?
- Is there any way to illustrate this article? What sort of image would even be appropriate?
- Does this article need any expansion, such as more detailed discussion of the copyright and licensing issues?
All comments are, as always, appreciated. Serpent's Choice 06:52, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 23:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)