Wikipedia:Peer review/Satake clan/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to hear how it can be improved and what parts of it need work.
Thanks, Tadakuni (talk) 03:19, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement. If you want more comments, please ask here.
- This seems to be well done, but needs more material to provide context for the reader not familiar with Japanese history. Even though some terms are linked, adding more years would help (not everyone knows when the Muromachi period was. I also think that some brief background on this era of Japanese history and its wars would help.
- A map of Japan showing the places prominently mentioned in the article would also help.
- There are several very short (one or two sentence) paragraphs that should generally be combined or perhaps expanded.
- There are some places where it seems as if the description is of an individual, but the wording seems to be of the whole clan. For example, In the Muromachi period, the Satake served as provincial deputy (shugo) of Hitachi Province ... I think of a deputy as an individual, not a whole clan.
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:39, 25 August 2008 (UTC)