Wikipedia:Peer review/Ronald Reagan/archive3
Appearance
I would really appreciate it if you guys could please read over this entire article. I'm a little concerned about my efforts to improve the "Presidency" section, but I also just would like to know what you think. I am planning on nominating this article for a featured article after I get some feeback from you guys. Thanks, Happyme22 02:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
LuciferMorgan
[edit]- Review {{citeweb}}. LuciferMorgan 03:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Awadewit
[edit]- I took a quick glance at the article and several things jumped out at me right away.
- Why are the bulk of your references from Reagan's autobiography? Autobiographies are notoriously unreliable. Since the page has such a long list of sources, I would have expected those sources to be used. Also, you need to cite more extensively throughout the piece, particularly when you say "some people" or "there is dispute".
- Why does the invasion of Grenada receive only two sentences?
- Might you integrate the "Criticism" into the appropriate sections of the chronology, such as the Iran-Contra Scandal and the S&L Crisis, rather than relegating it to a list-like section at the end? Awadewit 04:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC)