Wikipedia:Peer review/Rickey Henderson/archive1

Rickey Henderson

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because we are trying to get the article listed as a Good article. I'm specifically concerned about the section Illeism, malapropism and anecdotes but would also like a general review.

Thanks, User:calbear22 (talk) 05:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SGGH

I suggest:

dont need to bold the name in the early years section
DONE (someone else)
some of these one line paragraphs need to be merged
do the same for these short para is the 1993-2000 section
you might want to expand the image captions into more descriptive ones than just what is happening in the picture.
the section "illeism, malapropism..." etc. MoS states that there should not be wikilinks in section headings/
DONE
references section should be "notes" and then underneath ideally ought to be a references section listing books used (a la Operation Camargue or Mozambican War of Independence)

Not many points to make because, simply, it is an excellent article. Good stuff SGGH ^speak! 22:56, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A couple done... Timneu22 (talk) 23:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]