Wikipedia:Peer review/Ready Flowers/archive1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…

There seems to be a number of biased parties editing this article.

Alright, will do a review soon. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:34, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, this is a pretty short article--the best thing that you could do for it would be to add sources and expand it. You should only expand it based on what you find in the sources though. As far as bias goes, try to just note the facts of what reliable sources say. That might make the article a bit short, but it will be hard for biased editors to argue with you if you are citing facts from reliable sources. Usually, the best way to expand an article like this is to do a Google News archive search. You might be able to find something on Google books too. You generally want to shoot for at least one citation per paragraph. Also, there shouldn't be spaces between citations. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you only have to search for results after 2004, since they were founded the next year. That really narrows it down. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]