Wikipedia:Peer review/Ray of Light/archive1

Ray of Light

I have recently added to and expanded the article about this excellent Madonna album. I'm looking for any suggestions on how to improve the article, as I hope to nominate it for good article status in the near future. -- Underneath-it-All 02:17, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dates should use either 0 or 2 commas, depending upon the subject of the article; American-related articles should use 2 commas, while British-related articles generally used 0 commas. For example, for two commas: In January 15, 2006, this and that happened, while for zero commas, use: In January 15 2006 this and that happened.
After a year, for consistency, a comma should either be used throughout the entire article or not used at all.

Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links.

Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:BTW, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006, but do not link January 2006.

There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
- with many critics complimenting the album's blend of pop and electronic music
- is/are weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations.
Numbers like those under "Cerifications and sales" should have citations.

This article can use copyediting to ensure that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. For example,
- generally positive; with many critics complimenting - semicolon should be replaced with comma
- "had a "Take a Bow"- the inside "s should be changed to 's.
- Los Angeles, California in 1997 comma missing after California
- and perhaps other copyediting fixes for grammar/spelling are needed.
I can't seem to find the quote covered by the first footnote in the reference provided.
Thanks, AndyZ _t 23:27, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I went through and have adressed many of the issues. I will go through the article again to look for other spelling and grammer errors, as well as weasel words. -- Underneath-it-All 02:52, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]