Wikipedia:Peer review/Rail transport modelling/archive1
This article is already pretty good, but it has no references, and also needs some cleanup and a few redlinks fixed/removed. --Janke | Talk 18:12, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- It looks pretty good, but could use some appropriate references using {{ref}}/{{note}} tags. Some comments:
- I see the article carries history commentary throughout the text rather than having a separate history section. But in this case I think it works.
- The "scales and gauges" could do with an explanation of how the guage naming scheme came to be. Also the use of guages throughout the text precedes the actual explanation. Maybe you could move the "scales and gauges" section near the top and put the long table under its own section?
- The sentence, "Some older scale models reach very high prices", in the general description, is out dangling on its own. It could use some expansion and maybe a percentage comparison. (Plus a reference.)
- Finally I'm tempted to suggest moving the list of manufacturers near the end to its own page, but I'm not 100% on that. I do think they could do with some brief comments about the guages and trains they support, or some such thing.
- Thanks. — RJH