Wikipedia:Peer review/Pure Storage/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
My name is Zac Bond and I work for Pure Storage. It appears 4 years ago a prior employee disclosed, made some minor edits, and requested larger ones on Talk, which were implemented by a volunteer. The tag alleging Terms of Use violations was added because of user AaronEndre's incomplete disclosure when he started the page 11 years ago. This page has been re-written since then, but the tag was left up due to neutrality/tone concerns.
It's possible I'm not summarizing correctly, but that's what I've gathered. In a nutshell, it appears the current page is still not considered neutral as a result of Talk page contributions from a former Pure Storage employee. I'd like your feedback on how I can fix that, where and how the page sounds promotional, and how for me to best assist. ZacBond (talk) 23:16, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- @ZacBond: I appreciate your efforts to edit in good faith in adherence to the WP:COI policy. Peer review is not the appropriate place to request feedback about content that is not in the mainspace. Since I don't see any glaring issues with the live article, I'm going to close this review per WP:PR/RP. I'll leave a message on the article's talk page with some feedback on how your draft can be improved. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 09:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC)