Wikipedia:Peer review/Protocarnivorous plant/archive1
Appearance
I'd like to try and get this article up to FA status and would appreciate comments that would work toward that end. Specifically, a few word choices may be awkward. Since I'm so involved in the article, I'd appreciate other points of view. Do I satisfy WP:LEAD? Nitpick away! --Rkitko (talk) 03:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 22:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Nice article! I could only find two things to mention:
- In the section Defining carnivory, the paragraph on the broader definition is a bit unclear.
- The Other subsection doesn't seem to fit within its section; rather than "other trapping mechanisms", it seems to be about "other uses for trapping mechanisms besides carnivority".
- Anomie 13:42, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the input! I'll look in to reworking that broader definition paragraph. It's difficult to describe. Great point about the other section. Capsella bursa-pastoris is definitely an "other" trapping mechanism, but you're right about the other three listed there. Perhaps they deserve their own section? Or merged into their respective sections--pitfall and bladder traps? Cheers, --Rkitko (talk) 16:07, 15 May 2007 (UTC)