Wikipedia:Peer review/Prostate cancer/archive1
Appearance
This article is currently the medicine collaboration of the week. Would be nice to get some feedback on what should be improved especially from people with a non-medical background. Hope to get some good feedback and maybe this could be a FAC soon. --WS 19:17, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
- Looking good so far. Some comments:
- My main suggestion is that some of the sections should be merged together because most of the sections are too short. Each section should be three paragraphs each, ideally.
- Can more pictures be added?
- It is really well referenced, I'm impressed.
# You might want to start using the {{main|otherarticle}} template format for sections that are a summary of a sister article.
Not much else to say from my quick look at the article. Keep up this good work.
— Wackymacs 19:29, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comments. What sections would you suggest to be merged? I think it is sometimes better to have a few short sections than mixing things up. Indeed some more pictures would be nice. --WS 20:58, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
- Well, according to WP:MOS and Wikipedia:Section, it is better with less sections. I would suggest you remove the 'Biopsy' as a subsection in the Diagnosis section. I would also suggest doing something with the short 'Follow-up care' and 'Cryotherapy' subsections, unless you can expand them and make them worthy. The 'Screening/Early detection' subsection of the 'Current research' section is also very short. — Wackymacs 21:20, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
- Removed the biopsy header, moved the follow-up care info elsewhere. I think cryotherapy is worthy on its own as it is and will leave this in for now. The whole current research section needs quite some work, so that will probably come later. --WS 22:05, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
- Well, according to WP:MOS and Wikipedia:Section, it is better with less sections. I would suggest you remove the 'Biopsy' as a subsection in the Diagnosis section. I would also suggest doing something with the short 'Follow-up care' and 'Cryotherapy' subsections, unless you can expand them and make them worthy. The 'Screening/Early detection' subsection of the 'Current research' section is also very short. — Wackymacs 21:20, 29 November 2005 (UTC)