Wikipedia:Peer review/Polar city/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for June 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it's my first Wikipedia Article.
Thanks, Joey (talk) 17:36, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comments by Ilse@
- The first sentence with the subject definition could be improved: written in singular ("A polar city is...") and shorter, see for more info Wikipedia:Manual of Style#First sentences.
- I like the image, but I would like to see a caption explaining better what is shown, see for more info Wikipedia:Captions.
- The purpose of using an infobox instead of a simple image is unclear to me.
- If there are more futurists ("some futurists") that published about the concept of the polar city, they could be mentioned, and their concepts could be compared.
- The facts mentioned in the last paragraph ("After reading ... somewhere issue.") do not seem encyclopedic to me. I believe the non-encyclopedic content should be removed.
- There are some more words in the article that could be wikilinked, see for more info Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)#Internal links.
- The article could be categorized, see for more info Wikipedia:Categorization.
- The references could be formatted, see for some useful templates Wikipedia:Citation templates.
Success with the article! – Ilse@ 09:00, 22 June 2008 (UTC)