Wikipedia:Peer review/Plug-in hybrid/archive1

Plug-in hybrid

How can this article be made more accessible to the general public and policymakers who might be deciding whether to offer incentives? BenB4 16:01, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's pretty good now, thanks to your ad hoc improvement drive. I'm going to nominate it for GA. James S. 12:08, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's improving fast, although the technology section is still jumbled and inaccurate. I think it will look better in about a week, with more refs to technical papers. Jack Rosebro 00:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 04:04, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think the "History" section should be incorporated into prose. Right now, it reads like a timeline or a list. Perhaps Timeline of hybrid technology or even Timeline of plug-in hybrid technology would be a suitable article, but I don't think it's good to have in this article. For instance, the 2001-2005 section shouldn't be sub-sectionized, and the 2006 section should not have a separate paragraph for each date. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 13:11, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The "Powertrains" section needs sourcing, as does the "Improved fuel efficiency" section under "potential advantages". – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 13:13, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The "See also" list is huge. Almost all items should be incorporated into the text, and many of them already are (and therefore shouldn't be in the "see also" list). – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 13:13, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]