Wikipedia:Peer review/Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I've recently expanded it with lots of new pictures and some new information.
Thanks, dllu (t,c) 02:54, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Few minor thoughts:
- check the WP:EL guideline; for example [1] should not be linked in text, it should be an internal wiki link
- there are paragraphs missing citations, and I haven't checked if the ones with end-of-para cites have refs that covers all the info from a given paragraph
- Toker ref should be split into further reading if it is not used as an inline ref
- would be good to have a section of its cultural significance for Pittsburgh/Pennsylvania/US