Wikipedia:Peer review/Pando (Quaking Aspen)/archive1

I would like to see this become a featured article. Suggestions on layout, photo placement, and section headers would be most helpful. Globeism 16:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This won't get featured without an (ideally, several) actual picture of the place.
The "location" and "name" sections are way too short.
The lead contains too many refs compared to the body of the article. It also contains information not in the article, which contradict WP:LEAD
A location map/coordinates would be really nice
Thealternate claimant trivia bit and the name section should be cited
Too much direct quotations in regard to the lenght of the article.
Trivia could be easily reworked within the article
As a side comment, having an actual Quaking Aspen article would be a plus.
The images should be spread through the article instead of bunched at the bottom. if they can serve no purpose outside the gallery, they should go completely
Circeus 16:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with these issues. I've uploaded a Forest Service image of an aspen grove at Fishlake National Park, but the place is huge and it's probably filthy with them, so the image probably isn't of Pando. I've searched for coordinates, but they don't seem to be forthcoming; see the talk page. Melchoir 18:44, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]