A peer review was made in the past month with good results, but it needs some more copyediting to make it suitable for FA (criteria 2a of FA - the only issue that was raised during FAC nomination). It would be great as the geography articles in the FA list are mindblocking, limited to certain areas, because of the language, which scares users from other countries. Wikipedia and I need your help!--Pedro20:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I started copyediting again but I haven't got very far. If you are going for FA status it needs some hard work doing on it with regard to copyediting which will mean your personal writing style being lost. 2a is hard work. The references should use the citation templates (this will probably come up in FAC review), and you need to check WP:MOS for some style tips (such as adding non-breaking spaces). Good luck - Yomangani00:11, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've no problem with my personal style being lost in this wikipedia. I'll check the Manual of Style for more tips.I'll correct that problem in references. thanks a lot Yomangani.--Pedro11:00, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
