Wikipedia:Peer review/Oxidative phosphorylation/archive1
Appearance
I’ve radically updated this formerly poorly laid out and incomplete article. Will somebody who knows about this subject please have a look over the updated version and add to and or correct it as need be. Simpsons contributor 23:28, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 00:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Citations of review articles and for every section should be given.--Stone 18:18, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- mathtml and normal writing for chemical equations is mixed and should be turned back to normal, because math is not necessary.--Stone 18:24, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've jumped into the fray to help edit the article. You can see my discussion on the talk page, which contains some forward-looking statements. I think Stone's suggestion of review articles is excellent / requisite. --Antelan talk 21:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
AnonEMouse
[edit]Copyedit only, I'm afraid, as I'm not a biochemist
- ATP synthase and G proteins - seems to be a blank subsection?
- NADH and FADH2, each contain - dump the comma
- Why is NADH linked there and FADH2 not?
- cells nucleus and the mitochondrion - cell's, no the
- Oxygen is converted to Water in this step. - lower case water