Wikipedia:Peer review/Orion Nebula/archive1
Appearance
I think this article covers the topic of this famous and beautiful emission nebula reasonably well, although perhaps there are a few other esoteric astrophysical topics that could also be included. What do you believe this article needs to make it FA-quality? Thank you! — RJH 19:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
- Damn! I've had a half-done rewrite of this article sat on my computer for ages waited for me to finish it, and now I've been beaten to it. Great to see this article deservedly expanded from its previous stubbish length. Ionised nebulae are my field of expertise so I'm keen to review and work on this article, but may not have time for the next couple of days. In the meantime, you might like to compare with another ionised nebula article, Cat's Eye Nebula - already an FA. I'll post proper comments as soon as I can. Worldtraveller 16:08, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- That would be excellent. Thank you. — RJH 15:28, 6 April 2006 (UTC)