Wikipedia:Peer review/Nyborg Municipality/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion is closed. |
I'm working on all the pages for municipalities in Denmark, going through them one by one. Nyborg - my home municipality - was naturally the first. So I would like to see if the format and writing is good, considering a lot of pages will follow the same style. I also might nominate it for GA sometime, so ways to improve towards that would be nice, too.
Thanks. Kaffe42 (talk) 19:24, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
There are a few things I noticed quickly that should be improved if your goal is GA (See the Good article criteria):
- The lead section of the article is too short. Ideally, the lead of this article should be 2–3 paragraphs (I would describe the current one as somewhere between 1 and 2) and a summary of all the content of the article (There is little to no mention of the content in most sections).
- The last paragraph of the History section and the section about Ullerslev are not cited.
- The demographics and economy sections need expansion.
If you would an example of what a GA looks like for this type of article, I would recommend reading Fort Saskatchewan. Username6892 (Peer Review) 17:37, 25 October 2020 (UTC)