Wikipedia:Peer review/Noah's Ark/archive1

Noah's Ark

• A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for June 2009.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it used to be a Featured Article but is not any more. And I think we should work on it.

Thanks, Arlen22 (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Redtigerxyz's review

• Searches for Noah's Ark deserves a brief para
• Historicity of Noah and the Deluge, should also be discussed in brief
• A section on "Artistic depictions" can be created
• Narrative should include
  • Dimensions of Ark as in the Bible
  • only Noah and those with him on the Ark. Who?
  • Building material as in the Bible
  • After the deluge, what did they do with the Ark?
• "In Christian tradition" should include any retelling (if any) and difference with the Bible
• "In Rabbinic tradition" needs more references for interpreattions like "Noah's failure to warn others of the coming flood was widely seen as casting doubt on his righteousness—was he perhaps only righteous by the lights of his own evil generation?"

--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:01, 10 July 2009 (UTC)