Wikipedia:Peer review/Neo-Mitochondrial Creatures/archive1

Neo-Mitochondrial Creatures

I have constructed this article myself, and despite having (clearly) fictional basis, I would like to hear critsism about the look, "feel", set-up, and its overall construction. Surprisingly, no one else has edited the page after I created it, and I thought that maybe that meant nothing was "wrong with it". Finally, I'd like to know what the community thinks of this article as well as my projects as a whole so far. Thanks! -MegamanZero 18:13 29,November 2005 (UTC)

Here are my comments:

List the references you used to write this article (websites, articles, newspapers, etc etc)
The lead paragraph should summarize the article, one sentence is too short.
Image captions aren't great, could be improved.
Images also need moving so they start at the top, and don't create a load of empty space at the end of the article as they do now.
More context would be good, the article is a bit short.

Good effort so far. — Wackymacs 18:09, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In ordeer:

No problem. I'll handle that right away.
Okay, any suggestions how I should format it..?
Could you explain why they aren't that great..? I'll be glad to change them.
Done.
I need someone more versed in the Parasite Eve games -could you help me find someone..? Even though, however, there's not much to tell...they're simple video game enemies. =)

Thank you for the suggestions. -MegamanZero 23:41 1,Decemer 2005 (UTC)

Resubmitted request as of March 29 :

Much has happened since the previous peer review. I've become a different, more experienced editor, I've cited resources, done various clean-up, and more information has been inserted for inclusion. A final opinion before I inquire featured article status would be lovely. And, please, don't just make suggestions, feel free to edit if you see a qualm that needs adressing. This is a wiki after all. -Zero^Talk 15:12, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]