Wikipedia:Peer review/Napoleonic looting of art/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this peer review because I would like to reach this article, which touches on the history of an enormous number of significant artworks, to B-class and eventually GA status. I'm particularly interested in recommended expansions to the article, to include more affected countries, as well as large cuts, since the article is already around the 40kb area. I'm also wondering if the list section should be split off into a separate article.
Thanks, —Wingedserif (talk) 22:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Wingedserif: The "List of artworks taken"-section should certainly be split from this article. In fact, you could be bold and just split it immediately (WP:SPLIT allows bold splitting if it is uncontroversial and clearly notable). Judging from the list content, it could be made into a table with images of the art, their location, artist, etc. which definitely deserves to be a standalone list. Wretchskull (talk) 12:34, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Done! —Wingedserif (talk) 18:19, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
