Wikipedia:Peer review/Multimeter/archive1
Appearance
I'd like to get a peer review for this article to help improve its quality. Eventually, I'd like to give it a run at Featured Article status. I know that's a ways off, so I'd like to develop a laundry list of things that need to be improved before it can reasonably be considered for FA. Thanks!! -- Mikeblas 15:24, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 15:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- In the Measured Quantities section the two last paragraphs don't really belong. In the References section there is a paucity of non-vendor material. There could be good text books, or non sales oriented web sites. Perhaps there could be more of a section on how the device works and a block diagram. Another section could cover the criticisms and problems experienced with multimeters -- eg display fluctuating, load on circuit, inability to attach probes, limits to current or voltage handling, resolution higher than accuracy... GB 11:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Also could do with some history of the multimeter, when a combined meter was first developed, when the first digital one was made, etc. Trebor 15:02, 31 January 2007 (UTC)