Wikipedia:Peer review/Muhammad/archive1
This article contains a lot of informations, and its apparently have mantained its NPOVness. I think it's ready for WP:FAC. Just a little Peer Review. CG 15:34, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
- a) it's quite low on references, lots of statements could do with sourcing b) e.g. Criticism of Muhammad is often equated with blasphemy, which is punishable by death in some Muslim-majority or Islamist states. should have a reference to a specific example c) lots of non specific statements: some societies are more credible than others. - which ones d) weasle words / "some say" e) I think it's quite unbalanced: Muhammad's life according to Sira is very long (and should probably be a separate article) whilst Muslim reverence for Muhammad lacks a plain text description, statistics etc. f) please give references to the texts which "have raised doubts about the reliability of these sources" Mozzerati 21:22, August 24, 2005 (UTC)